- 注册时间
- 2011-10-26
- 最后登录
- 2024-6-16
- 阅读权限
- 150
- 积分
- 72067
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 26603
|
https://www.moonofalabama.org/20 ... 22-39.html#comments
关于俄军的后勤问题,这有一个评论,认为俄军未必比北约差,实战与纸上作业有很大差距
The part of that NATO study that missed everything was the technological improvements Russia has made over the last few years. As Martyanov would point out and Scott Ritter has also said it, any fight with NATO would result in total loss of NATO command and control in the first hours, just like Ukraine experienced. This is because of Russia's supersonic and hypersonic precision missile systems, which NATO can not defend against. Every NATO HQ and airfield and rail head would be eliminated within a couple days. Thirty NATO war games over the last few years have shown Russia defeating NATO even when NATO had the initial advantage.
As for Russia being slow at logistics, analysts have pointed out how slowly NATO could organize its forces just for its NATO exercises in Europe. It takes them weeks to move forces around. In Ukraine there was a report that Russia has been shelling the Donbass Ukrainians nonstop for at least a day with no apparent downtime for artillery resupply. Presumably only the wear and tear on the artillery barrels should slow down the assault. |
|