科学研究发现人越有钱就越反人类(就是中国老话为富不仁)

马列托主义者

科学研究发现人越有钱就越反人类(就是中国老话为富不仁)

社会科学包括心理学都遵守大数定律,就是统计学意义上的规律,而不是个别人如何如何,肯定有个别少数富人可能是善,但是大多都是伪善,比尔盖茨那种什么基金会不过是变相的资本扩张而已.我认为在恶的制度下,不是富而不仁,而是为富不仁就是因为不仁才能致富,腐败官商学就是典型,用好的词叫精明,用坏点的词叫奸猾.


人はお金をたくさん持っているほど非人道的になっていく
有http://www.pnas.org/美国国家科学院进程发表

You have successfully emailed the post.
Researchers Say That The More Money You Have, The Less Humane You Become
Vivian Giang | Jul. 5, 2012, 3:33 PM | 1,874 | 13


In this month New York Magazine's cover story, Lisa Miller mentions several studies that argue money really is the root of all evil, turning people into incompassionate, inhumane, selfish individuals.  
In one study published in the journal "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences" psychologist Paul Piff tells Miller that people "living high on the socioeconomic ladder can, colloquially speaking, dehumanize people" and are "less compassionate than other people."

The psychologist designed several experiments including one with two players competing against one another in the game Monopoly. In this experiment, one player unfairly gets the upper hand on his competitor. There is actually no chance for his competitor to win because of the way the rules are set up. As the game goes on, the player with the upper hand begins to feel more comfortable with his good fortune and starts to act in a belligerent manner.

“Putting someone in a role where they’re more privileged and have more power in a game makes them behave like people who actually do have more power, more money, and more status,” Piff says.

“While having money doesn’t necessarily make anybody anything, the rich are way more likely to prioritize their own self-interests above the interests of other people. It makes them more likely to exhibit characteristics that we would stereotypically associate with, say, assholes.”

Miller mentions another study published in the journal "Science" that said people with more money were less emotional and experienced less physical pain than those who were not as financially well off.

Researcher Kathleen Vohs, a professor at the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota, found that people with more money were able to keep their hand under burning-hot water longer and feel less emotional distress when excluded from a ball-tossing game.

“Money brings you into  functionality mode. When that gets applied to other people, things get mucked up," Vohs tells Miller. "You can get things done, but it does come at the expense of people’s feelings or caring about them as individuals.”

What do you think? Do you think Miller's arguments are valid, and do you think people with more money are less humane than those not as financially fortunate? You can let us know in the comments section below.



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/r ... 012-7#ixzz2072ASCx4

御姐脚上袜

因为资本主义生产关系已经越来越不适应生产力的发展了。这种生产力与资本主义生产关系的矛盾冲突，是时起时伏、波浪式发展的，但总的趋势却是一以贯之的：越来越激烈。

在这种情况下：资产阶级要巩固生产关系，就必须在一定程度上破坏生产力（经济危机时尤其明显）；要发展生产力，就必须在一定程度上突破生产关系。生产力与生产关系，二者不可得兼，资产阶级当然是舍“力”而取“关系”也。而且他越有钱，就表明他从这个生产关系中得益越多；维护这个生产关系的态度，当然也就越坚决。

用“做蛋糕”与“分蛋糕”的流行话语来解释：做蛋糕就是生产力，分蛋糕就是生产关系。资产阶级现在的态度就是：宁可蛋糕越做越小，也要保证我拿到最大的那一块。这不是赤裸裸的利己主义又是什么呢？这不是赤裸裸的反人类又是什么呢？

老汉

要获得比社会平均高得多的利益，他必须采用不正当的手段，他要保护不正当的收人，又必须采取邪恶的手段，这是恶性循环。

远航一号

很有意思